An improved finite-difference procedure for electromagnetic eigenvalue problems

Author(s):  
Gregory P. Junker ◽  
Richard K. Gordon
Author(s):  
S. C. R. Dennis

Two recent papers have discussed eigenvalue problems relating to second-order, self-adjoint differential equations from the point of view of the deferred approach to the limit in the finite-difference treatment of the problem. In both cases the problem is made definite by considering the differential equationprimes denoting differentiation with respect to x, with two-point boundary conditionsand given at the ends of the interval (0, 1). The usual finite-difference approach is to divide the range (0, 1) into N equal strips of length h = 1/N, giving a set of N + 1 pivotal values φn as the analogue of a solution of (1), φn denoting the pivotal value at x = nh. In terms of central differences we then haveand retaining only second differences yields a finite-difference approximation φn = Un to (1), where the pivotal U-values satisfy the equationsdefined at all internal points, together with two equations holding at the end-points and approximately satisfying the end conditions (2). Here Λ is the corresponding approximation to the eigenvalue λ. A possible finite-difference treatment of the end conditions (2) would be to replace (1) at x = 0 by the central-difference formulaand use the corresponding result for the first derivative of φ, i.e.whereq(x) = λρ(x) – σ(x). Eliminating the external value φ–1 between these two and making use of (1) and (2) we obtain the equationwhere for convenience we write k0 = B0/A0. Similarly at x = 1 we obtainwithkN = B1/A1. If we neglect terms in h3 in these two they become what are usually taken to be the first approximation to the end conditions (2) to be used in conjunction with the set (4) (with the appropriate change φ = U, λ = Λ). This, however, results in a loss of accuracy at the end-points over the general level of accuracy of the set (4), which is O(h4), so there is some justification for retaining the terms in h3, e.g. if a difference correction method were being used they would subsequently be added as a correction term.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
Zhiwei Song ◽  
Xiaoqiao He ◽  
De Xie

This paper conducts a comparison analysis of high order central finite difference (HO-CFD) method and discrete singular convolution-regularized Shannon kernel (DSC-RSK) scheme with small computational bandwidths for solving some classes of boundary-value and eigenvalue problems. Second-, fourth- and sixth-order partial differential equations are taken into account. New strategies to generate parameters [Formula: see text] in DSC-RSK are proposed to ensure minimum errors for each case, and the influence of parameters [Formula: see text] with more decimal places is analyzed. Apart from the existing matched interface and boundary (MIB) scheme, a new double-parameter MIB scheme is also proposed. The influence of small computational bandwidths is discussed in detail. Numerical results by using HO-CFD and DSC-RSK are presented and compared to illustrate the performance of both methods in small bandwidth limit. Some remarkable conclusions have been drawn at the end of this study.


1951 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 344
Author(s):  
NS Bayliss ◽  
JC RiviFre

Periodic potential energies were calculated for x-electrons along the molecular axes of butadiene and three polymethines NH2-(CH=CH)n-CH= NH2+, using Z'C = 1.0 and Z'N = 2.0 or 1 5 as the respective effective nuclear charges of the carbon and nitrogen nuclei. The Schroedinger equation was solved by finite differences, and with two restricted and self-consistent parameters, good agreement was obtained with observed ionization energies, band frequencies, and band intensities. The Brillouin zone effect is discussed, and also the screening in conjugated compounds. The use of an iteration procedure for the solution of eigenvalue problems by finite differences is described in Appendix I.


Author(s):  
H. C. Bolton ◽  
H. I. Scoins

ABSTRACTA discussion is given of the convergence of the eigenvalues Λ (N) of two-dimensional finite-difference equations towards the eigenvalues Λ of the corresponding second-order differential equation, and it is shown thatwhere h = N−1 and ν2 is a constant. As in our previous paper (4), this can be used to make an accurate estimate of λ by extrapolating to h = 0. After an account of the relaxation method used for computing Λ(N) and a discussion of the residual vector, results are presented for an approximation to the lowest spatially symmetric and antisymmetric states of two electrons in a sphere, interacting through their Coulomb potential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document